A CRITIQUE OF JOB DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE: SHAW'S ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES AND CONTEMPORARY APPLICATIONS

Résumé

Abstract This research critically evaluates job discrimination in the workplace through the lens of Shaw's ethical perspectives and contemporary applications. The study through the critical analytic method aims to examine the meaning and forms of discrimination, statistical and attitudinal evidence, historical and legal context of affirmative action, moral arguments for and against affirmative action, the doctrine of comparable worth, and the controversy surrounding it. Additionally, the research explores the moral implications of sexual harassment in employment.The critique reveals that while Shaw's work provides valuable insights into the moral implications of discrimination, it has limitations, including a limited scope, lack of intersectionality, overemphasis on moral arguments, and limited engagement with contemporary issues. Despite these limitations, Shaw's work has made significant contributions to the academic field and society by raising awareness about discrimination, informing policy and practice, advancing ethical scholarship, and providing a foundation for future research. This study contributes to the existing literature by offering a critical evaluation of Shaw's ethical perspectives and their contemporary applications, highlighting the need for ongoing critical evaluation and ethical consideration in addressing job discrimination in the workplace. The research aims to inform policymakers, practitioners, and scholars about the complexities of job discrimination and the importance of addressing it in employment settings.